Just got to know that. It made me thinking why is it enough to know only one response in the standard basis to derive response for any function if we should know responses for all basis vectors? Take for instance Fourier basis - we must know system responses to all sines and cosines to compute responses of functions, expanded in this basis. Why single delta function covers all sines?

Ok, delta function shows up as a constant in the Fourier space. It is a sum of all sines and cosines. But how knowledge of response to a sum of sines is equivalent to knowing response of every separate sine? Yet, it seems possble to recover individual complex exponentials from the entangled response.

I have found the reason. Time-Invariant (or translation-invariant, LTI) systems are represented by Toeplitz matrices, aka convolutions, which have complex exponentials as their eighenvectors. Diagonalized, nxn components of a matrix can be represented by only n eighenvalues when diagonalized.

## 2 comments:

An impressive share! I've just forwarded this onto a friend who had been conducting a little research on this. And he in fact bought me breakfast due to the fact that I discovered it for him... lol. So let me reword this.... Thanks for the meal!! But yeah, thanx for spending the time to discuss this subject here on your web page.

Look into my weblog - grandma hystad's Recipes

Thanks for a marvelous posting! I definitely enjoyed reading

it, you will be a great author. I will remember to bookmark

your blog and will often come back in the foreseeable future.

I want to encourage yourself to continue your great writing,

have a nice afternoon!

Feel free to surf to my page: zahnie.de

Post a Comment