1+ox |1-x 1- x 1+x+x²+x³+... x+ox² x-x² x²+ox³ x²-x³ x³
In the same vain, we can compute (11−x)2=11−x⋅11−x=(1+x+x2+x3+…)(1+x+x2+x3+…)=(1+x+x2+x3+…)+(x+x2+x3+x4+…)+(x2+x3+x4+x5+…)+…=1+2x+3x2…=∑∞0ddx(xn)=∑∞0nxn−1 Similarly, we can prove that (1−a)∑n−10ai=1+a+a2+…+an−1−a−a2−a3−…−an=1−an or 1−an1−a=∑n−10ai.
Note that 1+x+x2+x3+… maintains a constant value of 1. That is, (1) corresponds to a linear system. What is a corresponding linear system?
has a transfer function which has transfer function y=k(Fb⋅z−1y+x)=kx1−z−1kFb. Here, z−1 is a righward shit R[a0,a1,a2,…]=z−1[a0,a1,a2,…]=[0,a0,a1,a2,…] and H=k1−z−1kFb is the transfer function. Well, the specification is redundant. I can set simply k=1. We have already seen this system for the feedback amplifier Fb=3 and constant input x=2. Here is the generalized matrix form for x=1 and arbitrary Fb
[yn1]=[Fnb101]n[y01]=SΛnS−1Y0=[1101−Fb][Fnb001n][1−11−Fb011−Fb][y01] You see how y receives constant input, 2 from another state variable, 1, which maintains itself constant. The eigendecomposition fails when y's feedback is 1 because of 11−Fb, which is infinite. Yet, the transfer function-based solution, Y=X1−z−1=2(1−z−1)2, is still valid. It simply means that yn=1∗y0+2. The system implements a perfect integrator in this case. It does not exponentiate the accumulated value but adds inputs received from x together. The diagram is also valid in this case. If we want, we can also draw the system using nodes for the state variables
Again, input to the y is 2 from node "constant 1".
The state varying over time t can be represented as a vector y1,y2,⋯,yt,⋯. The coefficients of polynomial are used to represent such vectors. For instance 1+2y+1y2+5x3 represents vector 1,2,1,5. Now, series (1) represents variable stuck at state 1,1,1,1,1,⋯. This can be represented by a diagram
You see, it was in state 1 and next state is 1*1=1, so is the next state. It evolves by staying constant. It was sequence 11−y=1+y+y2+y3+…. Do you remember that 11+y was alternating 1,−1,+1−1,…? That is because feedback -1 in the denominator!
When we add two together,
we read output from the summation node (it does not feedback anything and thus, is not a state variable). You see that at first time step, both accumulators are 1, so the output is 2. On the next step, the integrators are in counterphase, -1 and 1, so they cancel out for y^1. In the next step, they are in phase again, and output 2 is repeated. The sequence is [2,0,2,0…] The corresponding matrix for sequence [2,0,2,0,…] yn=an+bn=[11][anbn]=[11][100−1][an−1bn−1]=[11][100−1]n[a0b0] is diagonal right away.
The interesting thing is that transfer function approach implies 0 initial values. Laplace way to solve diff eq do use the initial values.
This post was aided by Finite State Machine Designer
No comments:
Post a Comment